
Johns Hopkins UniversityEst. 1876
America’s First Research University
—
publishing material designed to speak to a wide audience of scholars, public intellectuals, and cultural practitioners working across diverse fields, regions, and venues. Now in its sixty-eighth year, MFS is published by Johns Hopkins University Press and is...
—
publishing material designed to speak to a wide audience of scholars, public intellectuals, and cultural practitioners working across diverse fields, regions, and venues. Now in its sixty-eighth year, MFS is published by Johns Hopkins University Press and is available online at Project MUSE.
(These guidelines apply to general submission. To submit an essay for a special issue, please see those specific instructions.)
Mfs invites the submission of articles (6,000-9,000 words) offering historical, interdisciplinary, theoretical, and cultural approaches to modern and contemporary narrative. Please visit our online submission system to upload your essay: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mfs
Documentation format should include internal citation, endnotes, and full Works Cited in accordance with the latest edition of the MLA Style Manual. Mfs welcomes the submission of illustrations. Low-resolution images are acceptable for submission, but authors must provide high-resolution images for publication.
Publication is contingent on authors granting exclusive license to Johns Hopkins UP to publish their essays for the Department of English at Purdue University. Authors may subsequently reprint their essays in books that they publish, provided they acknowledge the material's previous publication in Mfs.
Address editorial correspondence to
The Editors
Modern Fiction Studies
Purdue University
Department of English
500 Oval Drive
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2038
Phone: (765) 494-3758
FAX: (765) 494-3780
E-mail: [email protected]
The Hopkins Press Journals Ethics and Malpractice Statement can be found at the ethics-and-malpractice page.
MFS: Modern Fiction Studies publishes original essays of 6,000-9,000 words. We do not permit simultaneous submission. We have initial in-house screening of essays. If we decide not to send an essay out for external review, it will be rejected within a month. Essays we like are sent out to two external readers using the blind review system. After external review, essays are either 1) accepted, 2) accepted contingent on revision, or 3) marked as revise and resubmit. This review takes around 6-9 weeks. If accepted contingent, the author must address concerns of the external reports and send us a revised essay and explain to us how the revised version engages the reader reports. A decision on these essays is then made in house, typically within a week or two of receiving the revision. Authors who are invited to revise and resubmit must also explain how they’ve addressed the readers’ concerns. We send the revised and resubmitted essay out again for external review (often to one or both of the original readers). This may take another 6-9 weeks.
All book reviews are solicited. We do not consider unsolicited reviews.
Guest Editors: Matthew Gannon, Patrick Whitmarsh, and Kate Marshall
In 1965, Lyndon Johnson’s Presidential Science Advisory Committee published a dire warning on the state of the global environment: “Through his worldwide industrial civilization,” the report concluded, “Man is unwittingly conducting a vast geophysical experiment.” The report is a cultural marker of what historians J. R. McNeill and Peter Engelke call the Great Acceleration, a rapid expansion of growth and production in the postindustrial Global North. The roots of this planetary transformation can be traced even earlier, however. Already in the late nineteenth century, a moment that Andreas Malm pinpoints as the consummation of steam power, literary texts were beginning to conduct experiments of their own through representations of the fraught relations between humanity, technology, and ecology. In what Elizabeth Carolyn Miller calls the “long exhaustion” of extractive capitalism, authors began recognizing “the emergence of a society that was, in a new way, unsustainable for the long run.” This new, unsustainable society gave rise to striking literary impressions of environmental crisis and rupture within the experimental aesthetics of modernist writing as well as contemporaneous genre fiction, such as the Gothic, horror, science fiction, and the weird. Furthermore, the affinities between modernist writing and genre fiction reveal a generative dialogue between aesthetic developments occurring in literature—from the canonical texts of modernism to the “new weird” fictions of N.K. Jemisin, Carmen Maria Machado, China Miéville, and Jeff VanderMeer in the twenty-first century—and conceptual dimensions of critical and literary theory, especially those attempting to think planetary crisis. The current special issue identifies this generative dialogue as indicative of a long modernism reaching from the long exhaustion to the Great Acceleration and beyond, into the strange new realities of the postnormal twenty-first century.
We invite papers that examine links between emerging socioecological concerns and the experimental and speculative trends within this long modernist context. While contributors may focus on specific authors and historical moments within this extended temporal frame, the issue as a whole aims to build compelling throughlines between early-twentieth-century texts and the literary inheritors of modernism from the postwar era to the present, including those that venture deeper into speculative territory. Potential essays might consider the following questions: How has the literature of this long modernist period shown an interest—even implicitly or unconsciously—in accelerating climate change, environmental crisis, and other deep time metamorphoses of the planet? In what specific ways and toward what particular ends do these texts represent the accelerations of the Anthropocene? How do these narratives imagine other worlds or histories that help reimagine our own, especially by exacerbating the extent and effects of climate crises? How do they engage with or anticipate contemporary climatological concerns and literary tendencies? How does imagining the nonhuman mitigate anthropocentrism in characterization and narration? How do various genres and forms creep into—and sometimes clash within—the literary fiction of this period? How does recent literature and criticism draw on and repurpose the forms and ideas from the literary past? Essays are encouraged to examine lesser-known works or consider works whose engagement with these topics has been overlooked.
Contributors are invited to pursue any of the above questions and other related topics, including:
Essays that seek to retheorize central terms (modernism, genre, speculation, nature, Anthropocene, acceleration, weird, etc.) are welcome, as are essays that put texts in conversation with each other in rich and provocative ways.
Essays should be 7,000–9,000 words, including all quotations and bibliographic references, and should follow the MLA Handbook (9th edition) for internal citations and Works Cited. Please submit your essay via the online submission form at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mfs. Queries ahead of submission may be directed to Matthew Gannon ([email protected]) and Patrick Whitmarsh ([email protected]).
The past half-century of research in the humanities has been exciting by any measure of intellectual excitement. The vertiginous explosion of new subfields—queer theory, postcolonial studies, studies in race and ethnicity, disability studies, animal studies, indigenous studies, environmental humanities, new materialism, and digital humanities (just to name a few)—has opened new avenues of inquiry into the full range of human expression as well as unprecedented interdisciplinary inquiries into the relations between humans and nonhuman worlds, from bacteria and lichens to birds and bees to plastic and the polar ice caps. Research in the humanities explores our human cultural heritage and imagines our present and future interactions with each other and with the biosphere. Crucially, contemporary work in the humanities also seeks to preserve our “cultural heritage” without defaulting into nationalist or ethnocentric conceptions of culture, appealing instead to our collective—our global—need to understand our multiple heritages and trajectories as humans in terms of intraspecies diversity in all its manifestations, and in terms of our various and often vexed relations with the nonhuman world.
And yet that sense of excitement in new work is never matched by enthusiasm about the institutional status of the humanities in higher education, as that status seems to dwindle with each passing year. Falling enrollments, declining numbers of tenure-track faculty positions, a general atmosphere of malaise and bad morale—this is what people tend to think of when they think of the humanities today. Those people are not wrong. The quality of new research in the humanities bears no relationship to the public image of the humanities—even though, as Amanda Anderson has argued, a great deal of contemporary culture uses the interpretive tools of the humanities every day, every time someone reviews a new book, a new film, a new series on a streaming platform. Given this contradictory state of affairs, what foreseeable futures can we imagine for the humanities?
Essays of 6000–9000 words are welcome anytime between now and December 1, 2025.
This Special Issue invites papers on topics at the intersection of the Global South and climate crisis. In bringing these two areas of study together, we hope to suggest their complex imbrication: the Global South is increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic climate events; at the same time, ongoing breakdown—(neo)colonial economies of extraction, the racialization of laboring bodies and geographies, the creation of carceral and sacrifice zones, and migration and displacement—is a defining feature. Key to our understanding of the Global South is its constitution by the histories and conditions of global capitalism as well as attempts at resistance (López 2007; Prashad 2012; Armillas-Tiseyra and Mahler 2021). And yet, it is worth recalling that often the South is not only the site of anthropogenic devastation but also, as Amitav Ghosh has remarked, its “major driver” (Ghosh 2018). As the above remarks might suggest, we see “Global South Ecologies” not as an already-legible field of inquiry but as an invitation to interrogate the terms through each other.
Our framing of this Special Issue is in conversation with other recent critical investigations of the climate crisis with a literary or media focus (Song 2022; LeMenager and Shewry 2021; Iheka 2021; Hsu 2020; DeLoughery 2019; Farrier 2019). Literary texts give form and narrative shape as much to the catastrophic as to what Elizabeth Povinelli (2016) has labelled the “cruddy everydays” of the present. They capture the multiscalar and uneven texture of ecological devastation and disappearance. The term Global South as a relational geography itself emerges out of the distribution and sedimentation of power. In contexts of accelerated environmental change, it offers a strategic heuristic for a “rescaling of attention and concern beyond the local or national, beyond the human and anthropocentric, and beyond modernity itself” (Wenzel 2019). We anticipate that the contributions will draw practices from various fields of inquiry including Critical Anthropocene Studies, philosophy, feminism, Latinx Studies, Indigenous Studies, and postcolonial studies and address the comparative and interdisciplinary scope of the topic. Papers might interrogate ongoing histories of exploitation, jagged materialities of the present, or imagine different kinds of futurity. Equally, we welcome papers that work at the scale of the regional or the national, or that think about the global and planetary together (Chakraborty 2021; Baishya and Kumar 2022; Pratt, 2022).
We invite contributions that focus on a variety of temporal and geopolitical sites while being attuned to the politics of extinction, extraction and empowerment. Key topics the Special Issue seeks to address include but are not limited to:
Essays should be 7,000-9,000 words, including notes and references, and should follow the MLA Handbook (8th Edition) for citation style. Please submit your essay via the online submission form for MFS: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mfs
We welcome any queries about the special issue, and you can reach out to Pashmina Murthy ([email protected]) and Rituparna Mitra ([email protected]).
In addition to its continuing commitment to publishing the best scholarship on modern and contemporary fiction, MFS is also especially interesting in pursuing topics of current importance to literature and the humanities in general, including:
eTOC (Electronic Table of Contents) alerts can be delivered to your inbox when this or any Hopkins Press journal is published via your ProjectMUSE MyMUSE account. Visit the eTOC instructions page for detailed instructions on setting up your MyMUSE account and alerts.
Robert P. Marzec
Maren Linett
Frida Beckman
Rochel Bergman
Jeeyoung Choi
Emily M. Pearson
Daniel Froid
Magalí Armillas-Tiseyra, Pennsylvania State University
Frida Beckman, Stockholm University
Debra Rae Cohen, University of South Carolina
Elizabeth DeLoughrey, UCLA
Joseph Keith, Binghamton University
Anne Garland Mahler, University of Virginia
Timothy Melley, Miami University
Kalpana Seshadri, Boston College
Ragini Tharoor Srinivasan, Rice University
Aarthi Vadde, Duke University
Jay Watson, University of Mississippi
Marlo Denice David
John Duvall
Wendy Flory
Sandor Goodhart
Shaun F. D. Hughes
Robert Paul Lamb
Alfred J. López
Jennifer Freeman Marshall
Daniel Morris
Nancy J. Peterson
Arkady Plotnitsky
Aparajita Sagar
Michael Awkward, University of Michigan
Herman Beavers, University of Pennsylvania
Michael Bérubé, Pennsylvania State University
Stephen J. Burn, University of Glasgow
Debra Rae Cohen, University of South Carolina
Santanu Das, All Souls College, Oxford
Laura Doyle, University of Massachusetts
Jonathan Eburne, Pennsylvania State University
Anne Fernald, Fordham University
Ellen G. Friedman, College of New Jersey
Scott Herring, Indiana University
Peter Kalliney, University of Kentucky
John T. Matthews, Boston University
Deborah E. McDowell, University of Virginia
Mark McGurl, Stanford University
James McNaughton, University of Alabama
Alan Nadel, University of Kentucky
Kinohi Nishikawa, Princeton University
Stacey Olster, SUNY, Stony Brook
Robert Dale Parker, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Adam Parkes, University of Georgia
Rajagopalan Radhakrishnan, University of California, Irvine
Judith Roof, Rice University
Michael Rubenstein, SUNY, Stony Brook
Paul Saint-Amour, University of Pennsylvania
Ramón Saldívar, Stanford University
Urmila Seshagiri, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Anna Snaith, King’s College London
Stephen Hong Sohn, Fordham University
Siobhan Somerville, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Susan Strehle, SUNY, Binghamton
John J. Su, Marquette University
Phillip Wegner, University of Florida
Send books for review to:
The Editors
Modern Fiction Studies
Purdue University
Department of English
500 Oval Drive
West Lafayette IN 47907-1389
Please send book review copies to the address above. Review copies received by the Johns Hopkins University Press office will be discarded.
Source: Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory.
0.1 (2024)
0.3 (Five-Year Impact Factor)
0.00015 (Eigenfactor™ Score)
Rank in Category (by Journal Impact Factor):
Note: While journals indexed in AHCI and ESCI are receiving a JIF for the first time in June 2023, they will not receive ranks, quartiles, or percentiles until the release of 2023 data in June 2024.
© Clarivate Analytics 2025
Published quarterly
Readers include: Scholars and students of literary criticism
Print circulation: 304
Full Page: (4.75 x 7.5") - $450.00
Half Page: (4.75 x 3.5") - $338.00
2 Page Spread - $675.00
March Issue - January 15
June Issue - April 15
September Issue - July 15
December Issue - October 15
Promotion (400x200 pixels) - $338.00
Online advertising reservations are placed on a month-to-month basis.
All online ads are due on the 20th of the month prior to the reservation.
For more information on advertising or to place an ad, please visit the Advertising page.
Hopkins Press Journals