JHU Press Blog
by eea | Friday, August 10, 2018 - 12:00 PM
Although “Franken” has in the cultural zeitgeist become a watchword for the power of science to destroy humanity, Mary Shelley had a far more open view of science. Don’t mistake the messenger, Victor, for the message. In fact, in her day, “science” had a lower status than the arts, and hardly anyone made their living by doing science. This lower status meant that the power and value science now has fuels a paranoid reading of the scientific past as if this anachronistic wariness has the power to cleanse the present and to do away with any present obligation to work against the difficulties science presents. Even more surprising, in her day, science and ethics went hand in hand in part because science and feeling were aligned. Goethe, we recall, praised the “tender empiricist.” Good scientists feel the beauty of nature and use that beauty to fuel their careful observations. Perhaps the most important provocation Shelley's novel can make is to get us to think about the costs of the separation between science and ethics, and why science seemingly turned its back on sensibility and feeling.
What, you may be wondering, in a novel teeming with death, underwrites my claim...Read More
by bjs | Thursday, August 9, 2018 - 10:00 AM
A pair of Haverford College librarians recently published " False Starts and Breakthroughs: Senior Thesis Research as a Critical Learning Process " in the journal portal:Libraries and the Academy . Haverford students have to complete a senior thesis or work featuring comparable research. Margaret Schaus and Terry Snyder researched students in two majors to determine how future students could better use the research options available to them. The pair joined us for a Q&A on the study.
What value do you see in senior theses written by students at your college?
Students in all departments identify questions they want to answer, compile or generate data, and build arguments. For many students the research and writing lasts a full year with independent inquiry in archives, communities, and laboratories. The thesis represents a culmination of the work done in an academic department and a shared experience among seniors. At the same time, it promotes individual thinking and connections with the wider scholarly community. Students in our study often reported thesis research as a revelation because of its depth, complexity and unexpected power to change their thinking....Read More
by eea | Wednesday, August 8, 2018 - 12:00 PM
One of the claims I make in Reading and the Making of Time in the Eighteenth Century is that the feeling of not having time to read is almost as old as books themselves. We tend to imagine that when books were new media people struggled to put them down, a bit like tablets or smartphones today. But I went into this project knowing that many eighteenth-century readers felt as distracted from their books by work, by duty, and by magazines, broadsheets, and newspapers as I do by my email. Even back then, more sustained reading was something people hoped to do, or to have done -- something they did in snatches -- something dependent on the ebb of work that came with Sunday or the seasons.
Since finishing the project I’ve had cause to think a bit about this claim especially as I’ve started going with my family to a remote cabin without Internet. Being there has made me realize that all of us, and my kids in particular, find it much easier to sink into books there than they do at home. Perhaps our modern lack of reading time is more specifically connected...Read More
by bjs | Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - 10:00 AM
Michael Chabon's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay came out in 2000, but still resonates in literary circles nearly 20 years later. The Spring 2018 issue of MFS Modern Fiction Studies featured " The Politics of Escapistry: Harry Houdini, Nostalgia, and the Turn from Critique in Michael Chabon's The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay ," by Iain Bernhoft , a Visiting Assistant Professor of English at Providence College . Bernhoft joined us to talk about his essay and the staying power of Chabon's work.
How did you come to develop this essay?
When I initially read Kavalier & Clay , I was particularly interested in the way Chabon’s novel confronts traumatic history very indirectly. His approach to the Holocaust, for instance, is at once folded into the novel (both in plot and in some literary motifs or devices) and also held at a distance. You’d think that this would’ve keyed me in to the significance of Houdini in the text, but it was only when I was writing my dissertation—on how and why...Read More
by eea | Monday, August 6, 2018 - 12:00 PM
For generations, school children remembered the Webster-Hayne Debate by memorizing the ending to Daniel Webster’s Second Reply to Robert Y. Hayne. Its soaring articulation of nationalism and American nationhood—“Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable”—became a catchphrase for what American union meant. In one sentence, it summed up the Massachusetts senator’s career. For over 100 years after Webster first spoke those words in 1830, one could find them in history books and oratory manuals. They adorned statues of Webster and the facades of public buildings. Yet in modern times the debate has been relegated to a few lines in college textbooks. Why has the Webster-Hayne Debate been largely forgotten? That question led me to write The Webster-Hayne Debate: Defining Nationhood in the Early American Republic . Not only did I rediscover the history of the debate itself, but also how the debate illustrates the different ways in which Americans have understood what it means to be a nation.
Then and now, Webster’s dazzling oratory tends to overshadow the underlying meanings behind the Webster-Hayne Debate. Webster believed that the United States was a nation created by the people and held together by a single...Read More
by eea | Thursday, August 2, 2018 - 12:00 PM
Why should medical organizations look to faith communities as partners for health programs? Haven’t religious institutions lost their influence in America?
These are questions I am sometimes asked when people learn that much of my work is devoted to building alliances between medical organizations and religious congregations, especially if they have heard about a 2012 report from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public life that received widespread attention. This report, cleverly titled “Nones on the Rise: One-in-Five Adults Have No Religious Affiliation,” revealed that between 2007 and 2012 the number of Americans who reported no religious affiliation (“nones”) increased from just over 15% to just under 20%. While this is certainly a significant increase, the authors note that almost all of this growth in the numbers of religiously unaffiliated occurred among young adults, and they go on to present survey results that demonstrate the United States remains a “highly religious country.” For example, 90 percent of adults ages 65 and older reported a religious affiliation, as did 84 percent of those in the 50- to 64-year-old age group. And even among younger generations, the majority of adults still reported being religiously affiliated – 77 percent of those ages...Read More
by bjs | Thursday, August 2, 2018 - 10:00 AM
When Andrew Benjamin Bricker watches Saturday Night Live or the Jordan Peele film Get Out, he thinks of the eighteenth century. An Assistant Professor in the Department of Literary Studies at Ghent University in Belgium, Bricker recently published " After the Golden Age: Libel, Caricature, and the Deverbalization of Satire " in the Spring 2018 issue of Eighteenth Century Studies . Those modern comic works show the evolution of satire popularized in the eighteenth century by writers like Jonathan Swift and Alexander Pope. Bricker joined us for a Q&A about his article.
Why is the study of satire in the 18th century such a rich topic?
In part it is a rich topic because the early eighteenth century is such an exceptional moment in the history of literature. Not only is there a massive amount of satire being published and written, but it is also this new moment in English literary history when satirists are both famous and truly respected. Many of the satires we still read today come from this period--wonderful works of ironic tone like Gulliver’s Travels and A Modest...Read More
by bjs | Monday, July 30, 2018 - 10:00 AM
Five years ago, Grinnell College professor Thomas L. Moore audited an English class on Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson at his institution. A Professor, Emeritus in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at Grinnell, Moore worked over several years on a paper for that class. Earlier this year, the Emily Dickinson Journal published the final product, " Q.E.D.: What Emily Dickinson Did With Her Mathematics Books ." Moore joined us for a Q&A to talk about how an accomplished math scholar ended up publishing in a literary criticism journal studying the work of just one author.
What is it like to see a topic from a seminar you audited turn into a published essay?
It was like a series of small steps over five years, each accompanied by its own little surprise. I asked Steve Andrews to audit his Whitman-Dickinson seminar because I had been daunted by Dickinson poems and yet intrigued by them. All along the way it was Steve’s support and encouragement that brought me through those small steps: learning how to read an ED poem, creating a classroom environment where all...Read More
by bjs | Monday, July 23, 2018 - 10:00 AM
Libraries and librarians don't just worry about the mind. A special double issue of Library Trends takes a look at “Information and the Body.” Guest edited by Andrew M. Cox, Brian Griffin , and Jenna Hartel , the issues bring together researchers interested in embodied information, including in how we receive information through the senses, what the body “knows,” and the way the body is a sign that can be interpreted by others.
Cox is a senior lecturer at the Information School, University of Sheffield, where he is also head of the Digital Societies Research Group. Griffin is a PhD candidate in the Faculty of Information at the University of Toronto, Canada. Hartel is an associate professor at the Faculty of Information, University of Toronto.
The trio worked together to participate in a Q&A about the double issue. The issues are now available on Project MUSE.
How did this double issue come about? The idea for the issue came from working together on two previous articles related to information and serious leisure. Reflecting...Read More
by bjs | Monday, July 9, 2018 - 10:00 AM
Earlier this year, the Journal of Asian American Studies turned over the editorial reins to University of Washington professor Rick Bonus . An associate professor of American Ethnic Studies at UW, Bonus will lead the journal for the next three years. He joined us for a Q&A about the journal's place in the field and what readers and contributors can expect to see.
What does it mean to lead JAAS at a time like this, politically and socially?
I’m excited to be editor of JAAS in so many ways and on so many fronts! The year 2018 marks our 20th year of publication with JHUP and, looking back all the way into our first issue in 1998, it’s quite breathtaking to see where we came from, how we started, and how we’ve matured over the years. There’s tremendous enthusiasm within our editorial collective and our association in general! I feel that most especially within our ranks of reviewers who read submissions with such vitality, vision, and deep intellect, all signaling to me and our readers that we’re taking on scholarship that is so robust now and...Read More